E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
Today the White House disowned the legal advice of its top people, the Washington Post reports:
President Bush's aides yesterday disavowed an internal Justice Department opinion that torturing terrorism suspects might be legally defensible, saying it had created the false impression that the government was claiming authority to use interrogation techniques barred by international law.
Responding to pressure from Congress and outrage around the world, officials at the White House and the Justice Department derided the August 2002 legal memo on aggressive interrogation tactics, calling parts of it overbroad and irrelevant and saying it would be rewritten.
In a highly unusual repudiation of its department's own work, a senior Justice official and two other high-ranking lawyers said that all legal advice rendered by the department's Office of Legal Counsel on the subject of interrogations will be reviewed.
As part of a public relations offensive, the administration also declassified and released hundreds of pages of internal documents that it said demonstrated that Bush had never authorized torture against detainees from the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. In doing so, the administration revealed details of the interrogation tactics being used on prisoners, an extraordinary disclosure for an administration that has argued that the release of such information would help the enemy.
However, the Post explains, the Administration still hasn't come clean about all of its interrogation practices:
None of the documents provided by the White House governed practices at Abu Ghraib and other military prisons in Iraq, although some of the ideas approved at least temporarily -- such as stripping prisoners -- would be mirrored in the graphic photos that drew international condemnation and heavy scrutiny of U.S. detention practices. . . .
The documents that were released and the White House briefing focused on military interrogations and left many questions unanswered. Gonzales refused to comment on techniques used by the CIA, beyond saying that they "are lawful and do not constitute torture." He also would not discuss the president's involvement in the deliberations.
And, in a particularly remarkable maneuver, the White House Counsel plans to repudiate himself.
At issue was an Aug. 1, 2002, memo from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel to Gonzales. A Justice Department official said yesterday that the administration planned to scrap a provision in it opining that interrogators who torture al Qaeda or Taliban captives could be exempt from prosecution under the president's powers as commander in chief. "I don't believe it was necessary," the official said. "The president never asked us to overrule" laws barring torture, he said. Bush has not authorized any interrogations that would employ methods outside the law, he said.
Gonzales said that memo and a related Pentagon memo had been meant to "explore the limits of the legal landscape," and to his knowledge had "never made it to the hands of soldiers in the field, nor to the president." He acknowledged that some of the conclusions were "controversial" and "subject to misinterpretation."
All of this begs the most important question: Why would the White House Counsel have requested such a memo in the first place? Generally speaking, when a superior asks a subordinate to do legal work, there is usually a back and forth about what questions are to be asked and what conclusions the memo is going to reach. That is especially the case when, as in the Bybee memo, the result is a finished product. To say that this memo was simply dropped on Gonzales' lap is ridiculous. Rather, it is more likely that Gonzales, and Bybee, and the rest of the team went over the memo with some care.
The question I have for the White House is, why isn't Gonzales resigning over this? And why hasn't the White House strongly repudiated Bybee, who now sits on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals? The reason seems clear enough: This wasn't a frolic and detour; Gonzales and Bybee were doing exactly what was asked of them.
Wait....you don't understand, Bush's leadership and plain spoken statements have empowered legions of lawyers trapped in a byzantine bureaucracy to free themselves of years of carefull indoctrination. They are now jumping head-first in assisting the war on terror. They are out to prove that the pen is truly mightier than the sword and that a team of governmental lawyers can be just as effective as the elite special forces at work in the battlefield.
Bush's cunningly effective public arguments have lifted their spirits and they now feel free to put forward their own policy papers.
That or they are simply trying to cover their rear as fast as possible by lying through their teeth.
If the media were only 10% more interested in getting to the truth, this administration would have had mass resignations months ago.
I love your information on Legal Advice I bookmarked your blog and will be back soon. If you want, check out my blog on Legal Advice Exposed - please come by
Microsoft, Yahoo to link instant messages (USATODAY.com via Yahoo! News) Microsoft and Yahoo will make their instant-messaging programs work together, a partnership that could give the companies more power to compete against market leader America Online. The companies expect the service to start by June 2006.
Take a minute right now, and imagine all the cool things you will do with Quick - how your life will be so much more better - and how your famly will change for the better. Quick
Better than klear action whitening and ION whitening systems! Half the price too!
Welcome to PerfectlyWhite.com,
PerfectlyWhite.com is proud to present to you the first ever at home laser whitening treatment. We are bringing you the most popular in office treatment at home for the fraction of the cost! One laser treatment at a doctors office can run around $600 as shown above. This is very exciting news for anyone who is looking into whitening their teeth professionally in the comfort of their own home. Best of all you can have this plasma light technology for much less! The light is yours to keep and can be used as many times as you like! You can achieve professional results in less than 7 days! Our method also works in between your teeth and deep down below the enamel. This procedure will not damage or wear away the enamel.
How does it work?
Its very simple. The Plasma light will increase the breakdown speed of Carbamide Peroxide, in turn releasing more oxygen which speeds up the bleaching process. The oxygen acts as a bleaching agent that whitens your teeth safely and effectively. This is why you can pay as much as $600 to get your teeth whitened professionally.
Plasma Laser Light Technology!
Never before seen in any at home whitening kit! Just Like at a real in office visit, all our deluxe kits have the plasma light tool to accelerate the whitening process. No one else offers this authentic at home tool. Its Very easy to operate and safe to use. Accelerate your whitening by as much as 300% with this method! This means whiter teeth in less time!
At last, you no longer have to visit your dentist for that white bright smile you have always wanted!
Our professional dental whitening kit is the same product used by many of the top cosmetic dentists. Why consider paying up to $600, when for a few short minutes per day, you to can achieve the exact same results in the comfort of your own home. Best of all, it will cost you a fraction of the price!
40% stronger than an in-office visit...
To provide you with superior results, our fully licensed line of products is one of the industry's strongest and most effective tooth whitening formulas. The main active ingredient is 35% Carbamide Peroxide. This concentration is 40% stronger than most dentists use during an in office visit!
A little more about our 7 day plasma treatment:
* This procedure will NOT harm or damage your tooth's enamel.
This system can't be found in stores!
We are the only internet site who sells this new product!
We are the exclusive seller of this NEW at home treatment!
You and your friends can take advantage of this treatment with just one plasma light!
Plasma light treatment only takes on average 7 days to complete!
Results are 100% guaranteed and 100% safe! for more informationCLICK HERE